Page 15 - MATINF Nr. 6
P. 15

Proof for AM-GM inequality using calculus tehniques




            Dorin M˘arghidanu       1



                There are many proofs for the well known inequality between arithmetic mean and geometric
            mean, or Cauchy’s inequality. See [1] and the more extensive bibliography contained therein.
                In this paper we shall give a new one. For this, we will give two preliminaries calculus results.

                Although the first result is known, we recall it - as a basis for the next.
            Lemma 1. For x > 1, holds the following inequality, e    1−  1 x < x<e x−1 .
            Proof. We consider the function f : [1, ∞) → [1, ∞), f(x) = ln x and apply Lagrange’s theorem
                                                                        lnx    1
            on the interval [1, x] ⊂ [1, ∞). There is c ∈ (1, x) so that     = .
                                                                       x−1     c
                      1 1                1   lnx           x−1
                Since   < <1, it comes     <     <1, thus       <ln x<x−1.
                      x c                x x−1               x
                By exponentiation we get indeed the inequality stated earlier.
                An inequality - interesting in itself - is stated in.

                                                               b−a  b    b−a
            Lemma 2. For 0 < a ≤ b, occurs the following e      b ≤ ≤e a .
                                                                    a
                                                                                                     a
            Proof. For a = b, we have obviously an equality. Supposing that b > a, then with x= >1 in
                                                                                                      b
            Lemma 1, it comes immediately the double inequality in Lemma 2.
                                                                                              ∗
                                                                                                       ∗
            Theorem 1. (Cauchy’s inequality or AM-GM inequality.) If x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x n ∈ R , n ∈ N and
                                                                                              +
                                              √
                   x 1 + x 2 + . . . + x n
            A :=                      , G :=   n  x 1 · x 2 · . . . · x n , then A ≥ G, with equality if and only if
                            n
            x 1 = x 2 = . . . = x n .
                               ∗
            Proof. For h ∈ N , we note: P h := x 1 · x 2 · . . . · x h , S h := x 1 + x 2 + . . . + x h ; thus A =  S n  ,
                  √                                                                                       n
            G :=   n  P n . Without restricting the generality, we suppose that 0 < x 1 ≤ x 2 ≤ . . . ≤ x n . Since
                                                                                     ∗
            min{x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x n } ≤ G ≤ max{x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x n } results that exist k ∈ N so that
                                     0 < x 1 ≤ x 2 ≤ . . . ≤ x n ≤ G ≤ x k+1 ≤ . . . ≤ x n                (1)
            By it’s very name – of (geometric) mean, G justifies it’s intermediate position!). With (1) and
            the left inequality in Lemma 2, we have:
                                                                     G
                                                              G−x 1
                                                 x 1 ≤ G → e   G   ≤                                     (2 1 )
                                                                     x 1
                                                                     G
                                                              G−x 2
                                                 x 2 ≤ G → e   G   ≤                                     (2 2 )
                                                                     x 2
                                                         . . .

                                                              G−x k   G
                                                 x k ≤ G → e   G   ≤                                     (2 k )
                                                                     x k
               1
                Profesor dr., Colegiul Nat , ional ,,Al. I. Cuza”, Corabia, d.marghidanu@gmail.com

                                                           15
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20