Page 21 - MATINF Nr. 8
P. 21

3.3  Lower bounds                                                                              21



            3.3     Lower bounds

                                                                                                          √
            Now, let us find the best numerical lower bound of the product under consideration for k ≥     3 ,
                                                                                                          3
            and over all non-obtuse-angled triangles ABC. We will also extend the result to nonnegative
            real numbers x, y, z.
                                                                       √
                                              2
                Just like before, denote p =  3t +1  , where t is fixed, t ≥  3 . According to Theorem 3 from [1],
                                              2t                        3
            the minimum value of r is attained when (x, y, z) is of the form
                                                           1 − t
                                                      Å         2  ã
                                                       t, t,
                                                             2t
                                            √
            (up to permutations) as long as   3  ≤ t ≤ 1. In addition, the minimum of r is equal to 0 whenever
                                             3
            t ≥ 1.
                         √
                Thus, if  3  ≤ t ≤ 1, then
                          3
                                                 kt − 1
                                               Å       ã 2
                                                                  2
                                       h(t) :=              k − kt − 2t ≤ F(k).
                                                  2
                                                 t + 1
                                                               ′
                                                                      ′
                Note that h(t) is the same as g(t) above, so h (t) = g (t) ≤ 0, which means that
                                                                    (k − 1) 2
                                             min h(t) = h(1) = −            .
                                              h √
                                            t∈  3 ,1 i                  2
                                               3
                Now, for z = 0, we have that

                                                         (kx − 1)(ky − 1)
                                               F(k) = −
                                                               x + y

            as xy + yz + zx = 1 turns into xy = 1.

                We will show that
                                              (kx − 1)(ky − 1)      (k − 1) 2
                                            −                   ≥ −          ,
                                                    x + y               2
            that is,
                                              (kx − 1)(ky − 1)    (k − 1) 2
                                                                ≤          .
                                                    x + y             2

                By cross-multiplying and taking into account the fact that xy = 1, we are left to prove the
            following inequality in x and k :
                                            1                          k
                                      Å       ã                      Å      ã
                                                       2
                                        x +     (k − 1) − 2(kx − 1)      − 1 ≥ 0,
                                            x                          x
            which is true as it can be rearranged into

                                                    2
                                                  (k + 1)(x − 1) 2
                                                                   ≥ 0.
                                                         x
                In conclusion,
                                                             (k − 1) 2
                                                   F(k) ≥ −
                                                                 2
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26