Page 26 - MATINF Nr. 8
P. 26

26                                                                4  ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION



                We will now show that the expression within square brackets is nonpositive. Indeed, since
                              √
            4y ≤ 1 and k ≥ 3 3, we get
                                             Ä     2    ä    √ Ä      2    ä
                                           k (4y) − 1 ≤ 3 3 (4y) − 1 ,

            so we only need to establish the following inequality:
                                                          √
                                       √ Ä      2    ä              p
                                                                                  2
                                     3 3 (4y) − 1 + 3 3 ≤ 16y         1 + 2y + 3y .
                The latter is equivalent to        √
                                                3y 3 ≤   p 1 + 2y + 3y ,
                                                                       2
            which is just
                                                        2
                                                  −24y + 2y + 1 ≥ 0
            after squaring both sides and rearranging. We’ve previously shown that the quadratic expression
            factorizes as (1 − 4y)(6y + 1), which is nonnegative, so our inequality holds.

                Equality is attained if and only if 4y = 1, or R = 2r, which corresponds to triangle ABC
            being equilateral.


                                                             î√      ä
                                 3
            4.4     inf F = −k in all triangles, k ∈            3 , ∞
                                                               3
                                                 3
            Note that the inequality F(k) ≥ −k is equivalent to
                                             ñ                                  ô
                                                  Å       ã 2             Å ã  2
                                                        y                   y
                                                                       2
                                      2

                                  k k + 1     1 + x −        − (1 + y) −          ≥ 0.
                                                        k                   k
                                                                                               2
                                                                            2
                                                                                                           2
                                                             2
                By the other inequality of Gerretsen, i.e. s ≥ 16Rr − 5r , we have that x ≥ 8y − 5y .
            Thus, proving that the expression within square brackets is nonnegative boils down to
                                                             2                   2
                                          Å                 ã               Å ã
                                                          y                   y
                                            p                           2
                                                      2
                                      1 +     8y − 5y −        ≥ (1 + y) +        .
                                                          k                   k
                Routine calculations allow us to transform the previous inequality into
                                                            2y  p
                                                                         2
                                               6y(1 − y) ≥       8y − 5y ,
                                                            k
            which holds true if y = 0. Otherwise, we can divide by 2y and square both sides, thus getting
                                                           8y − 5y 2
                                                      2
                                                     k ≥            .
                                                          9(y − 1) 2
                        1
                    2
            Since k ≥ , we are left to prove that
                        3
                                                     1    8y − 5y 2
                                                       ≥           ,
                                                     3    9(y − 1) 2
            or

                                                   y −  3  y −  1
                                                        2       4
                                                                   ≥ 0,
                                                      (y − 1) 2
                                                      1
            which is clearly true given that 0 ≤ y ≤ .
                                                      4
                Equality holds if and only if triangle ABC is degenerate with two angles equal to 0 (in which
                                                                                √
            case y = 0), or if and only if triangle ABC is equilateral and k =   3  (in which case y = 1/4).
                                                                                 3
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31